↓ Skip to main content

The ALIEN study: incidence and outcome of acute respiratory distress syndrome in the era of lung protective ventilation

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
489 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
437 Mendeley
Title
The ALIEN study: incidence and outcome of acute respiratory distress syndrome in the era of lung protective ventilation
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, October 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00134-011-2380-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jesús Villar, Jesús Blanco, José Manuel Añón, Antonio Santos-Bouza, Lluís Blanch, Alfonso Ambrós, Francisco Gandía, Demetrio Carriedo, Fernando Mosteiro, Santiago Basaldúa, Rosa Lidia Fernández, Robert M. Kacmarek, on behalf of the ALIEN Network

Abstract

While our understanding of the pathogenesis and management of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has improved over the past decade, estimates of its incidence have been controversial. The goal of this study was to examine ARDS incidence and outcome under current lung protective ventilatory support practices before and after the diagnosis of ARDS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 437 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 419 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 50 11%
Other 49 11%
Student > Postgraduate 43 10%
Student > Master 43 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 43 10%
Other 119 27%
Unknown 90 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 239 55%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 22 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 3%
Other 34 8%
Unknown 98 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2023.
All research outputs
#13,175,336
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#3,667
of 5,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,108
of 138,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#17
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,104 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 138,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.