↓ Skip to main content

Mass spectrometry-based proteomics for system-level characterization of biological responses to engineered nanomaterials

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Mass spectrometry-based proteomics for system-level characterization of biological responses to engineered nanomaterials
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00216-018-1168-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tong Zhang, Matthew J. Gaffrey, Brian D. Thrall, Wei-Jun Qian

Abstract

The widespread use of engineered nanomaterials or nanotechnology makes the characterization of biological responses to nanomaterials an important area of research. The application of omics approaches, such as mass spectrometry-based proteomics, has revealed new insights into the cellular responses of exposure to nanomaterials, including how nanomaterials interact and alter cellular pathways. In addition, exposure to engineered nanomaterials often leads to the generation of reactive oxygen species and cellular oxidative stress, which implicates a redox-dependent regulation of cellular responses under such conditions. In this review, we discuss quantitative proteomics-based approaches, with an emphasis on redox proteomics, as a tool for system-level characterization of the biological responses induced by engineered nanomaterials. Graphical abstract ᅟ.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 4 20%
Researcher 4 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 15%
Other 3 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 25%
Environmental Science 4 20%
Chemistry 3 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 2 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2018.
All research outputs
#3,333,219
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#343
of 9,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,550
of 342,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#6
of 171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.