↓ Skip to main content

Optimal procurement mechanisms: bidding on price and damages for breach

Overview of attention for article published in Economic Theory, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Optimal procurement mechanisms: bidding on price and damages for breach
Published in
Economic Theory, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00199-013-0751-5
Authors

Ottorino Chillemi, Claudio Mezzetti

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 25%
Researcher 2 17%
Lecturer 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Librarian 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 3 25%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 25%
Mathematics 1 8%
Engineering 1 8%
Unknown 4 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2015.
All research outputs
#15,340,815
of 22,818,766 outputs
Outputs from Economic Theory
#228
of 342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,301
of 196,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Theory
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,818,766 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 342 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them