↓ Skip to main content

Review of automated fault detection and diagnostic tools in air handling units

Overview of attention for article published in Energy Efficiency, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
Title
Review of automated fault detection and diagnostic tools in air handling units
Published in
Energy Efficiency, November 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12053-013-9238-2
Authors

Ken Bruton, Paul Raftery, Barry Kennedy, Marcus M. Keane, D. T. J. O’Sullivan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 2 2%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 121 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 29%
Student > Master 27 21%
Researcher 17 13%
Lecturer 6 5%
Student > Bachelor 6 5%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 22 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 74 59%
Energy 13 10%
Computer Science 7 6%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Social Sciences 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 26 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2015.
All research outputs
#15,340,815
of 22,818,766 outputs
Outputs from Energy Efficiency
#228
of 325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,185
of 302,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Energy Efficiency
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,818,766 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 325 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.