↓ Skip to main content

Legislative budget cycles

Overview of attention for article published in Public Choice, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Legislative budget cycles
Published in
Public Choice, December 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11127-012-0043-9
Authors

Cameron A. Shelton

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 23%
Student > Master 5 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 23%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 14 64%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 23%
Philosophy 1 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Unknown 1 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2015.
All research outputs
#7,520,748
of 25,769,258 outputs
Outputs from Public Choice
#599
of 1,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,509
of 289,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Choice
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,769,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.