↓ Skip to main content

Was the Vampire of the Eighteenth Century a Unique Type of Undead-corpse?

Overview of attention for article published in Folklore, December 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Was the Vampire of the Eighteenth Century a Unique Type of Undead-corpse?
Published in
Folklore, December 2006
DOI 10.1080/00155870600928872
Authors

G. David Keyworth

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 3%
Slovenia 1 3%
Unknown 38 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 25%
Student > Master 6 15%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 5 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 12 30%
Social Sciences 10 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Linguistics 2 5%
Philosophy 1 3%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 6 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2021.
All research outputs
#7,463,719
of 22,818,766 outputs
Outputs from Folklore
#95
of 655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,567
of 155,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Folklore
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,818,766 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 655 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them