↓ Skip to main content

Threshold of Energy Deficit and Lower-Body Performance Declines in Military Personnel: A Meta-Regression

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Threshold of Energy Deficit and Lower-Body Performance Declines in Military Personnel: A Meta-Regression
Published in
Sports Medicine, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40279-018-0945-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nancy E. Murphy, Christopher T. Carrigan, J. Philip Karl, Stefan M. Pasiakos, Lee M. Margolis

Abstract

Negative energy balance (EB) is common during military operations, diminishing body mass and physical performance. However, the magnitude of negative EB where performance would still be maintained is not well defined. Our objective was to explore relationships between EB and physical performance during military operations and define an acceptable negative EB threshold where performance may be maintained. A systematic search was performed for studies that measured EB and physical performance during military training. A total of 632 articles and technical reports were screened. Lower-body power and strength were the most common performance tests across investigations and were used as physical performance outcomes. Data were extracted from nine eligible studies containing 15 independent subgroups. Meta-regression assessed changes in performance in relation to study duration (days), average daily EB, and total EB (daily EB × duration). Changes in physical performance were not associated with average daily EB or training duration. Total EB was associated with changes in lower-body power (r2 = 0.764, P < 0.001) and strength (r2 = 0.836, P < 0.001) independently and combined (r2 = 0.454, P = 0.002). Predictive equations generated from the meta-regression indicated that, for a zero to small (2%) decline in performance, total EB should be limited to - 5686 to - 19,109 kcal, for an entire operation, whereas total EB of - 39,243 to - 59,377 kcal will result in moderate (7%) to large (10%) declines in performance. These data demonstrated that greater total negative EB is associated with declines in lower-body performance during military operations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 17%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 25 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 19 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 31 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2022.
All research outputs
#3,649,823
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#1,662
of 2,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,550
of 328,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#26
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,700 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 50.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.