↓ Skip to main content

Analyzing patterns of community interest at a legacy mining waste site to assess and inform environmental health literacy efforts

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Analyzing patterns of community interest at a legacy mining waste site to assess and inform environmental health literacy efforts
Published in
Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13412-015-0297-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Monica D. Ramirez-Andreotta, Nathan Lothrop, Sarah T. Wilkinson, Robert A. Root, Janick F. Artiola, Walter Klimecki, Miranda Loh

Abstract

Understanding a community's concerns and informational needs is crucial to conducting and improving environmental health research and literacy initiatives. We hypothesized that analysis of community inquiries over time at a legacy mining site would be an effective method for assessing environmental health literacy efforts and determining whether community concerns were thoroughly addressed. Through a qualitative analysis, we determined community concerns at the time of being listed as a Superfund site. We analyzed how community concerns changed from this starting point over the subsequent years, and whether: 1) communication materials produced by the USEPA and other media were aligned with community concerns; and 2) these changes demonstrated a progression of the community's understanding resulting from community involvement and engaged research efforts. We observed that when the Superfund site was first listed, community members were most concerned with USEPA management, remediation, site-specific issues, health effects, and environmental monitoring efforts related to air/dust and water. Over the next five years, community inquiries shifted significantly to include exposure assessment and reduction methods and issues unrelated to the site, particularly the local public water supply and home water treatment systems. Such documentation of community inquiries over time at contaminated sites is a novel method to assess environmental health literacy efforts and determine whether community concerns were thoroughly addressed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 16%
Researcher 6 12%
Lecturer 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 9 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 10 20%
Social Sciences 9 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 13 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2015.
All research outputs
#18,420,033
of 22,818,766 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences
#318
of 360 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,739
of 264,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences
#20
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,818,766 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 360 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.