Title |
Paenibacillus larvae and American Foulbrood – long since known and still surprising
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety, November 2008
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00003-008-0379-8 |
Authors |
E. Genersch |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Argentina | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 67 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 14% |
Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
Other | 12 | 17% |
Unknown | 18 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 44% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 10% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 6 | 9% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Unknown | 18 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2015.
All research outputs
#1,406,153
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety
#7
of 146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,380
of 89,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,529 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them