↓ Skip to main content

The vertical lobe of cephalopods: an attractive brain structure for understanding the evolution of advanced learning and memory systems

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Physiology A, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
The vertical lobe of cephalopods: an attractive brain structure for understanding the evolution of advanced learning and memory systems
Published in
Journal of Comparative Physiology A, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00359-015-1023-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. Shomrat, A. L. Turchetti-Maia, N. Stern-Mentch, J. A. Basil, B. Hochner

Abstract

In this review we show that the cephalopod vertical lobe (VL) provides a good system for assessing the level of evolutionary convergence of the function and organization of neuronal circuitry for mediating learning and memory in animals with complex behavior. The pioneering work of JZ Young described the morphological convergence of the VL with the mammalian hippocampus, cerebellum and the insect mushroom body. Studies in octopus and cuttlefish VL networks suggest evolutionary convergence into a universal organization of connectivity as a divergence-convergence ('fan-out fan-in') network with activity-dependent long-term plasticity mechanisms. Yet, these studies also show that the properties of the neurons, neurotransmitters, neuromodulators and mechanisms of long-term potentiation (LTP) induction and maintenance are highly variable among different species. This suggests that complex networks may have evolved independently multiple times and that even though memory and learning networks share similar organization and cellular processes, there are many molecular ways of constructing them.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 148 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 36 24%
Student > Master 24 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 15%
Researcher 13 9%
Professor 7 5%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 32 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 28%
Neuroscience 28 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 15%
Environmental Science 5 3%
Psychology 5 3%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 35 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2023.
All research outputs
#7,827,343
of 25,074,338 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#452
of 1,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,370
of 269,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,074,338 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,494 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.