↓ Skip to main content

Fish mucus versus parasitic gnathiid isopods as sources of energy and sunscreens for a cleaner fish

Overview of attention for article published in Coral Reefs, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fish mucus versus parasitic gnathiid isopods as sources of energy and sunscreens for a cleaner fish
Published in
Coral Reefs, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00338-015-1313-z
Authors

Maxi Eckes, Sophie Dove, Ulrike E. Siebeck, Alexandra S. Grutter

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 2%
Unknown 56 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 23%
Student > Master 10 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 14%
Other 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 10 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 14%
Environmental Science 6 11%
Psychology 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 11 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2015.
All research outputs
#2,605,405
of 22,818,766 outputs
Outputs from Coral Reefs
#361
of 1,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,055
of 267,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Coral Reefs
#4
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,818,766 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,767 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.