↓ Skip to main content

May heavy neutrinos solve underground and cosmic-ray puzzles?

Overview of attention for article published in Physics of Atomic Nuclei, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 178)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
May heavy neutrinos solve underground and cosmic-ray puzzles?
Published in
Physics of Atomic Nuclei, February 2011
DOI 10.1134/s106377880801016x
Authors

K. M. Belotsky, D. Fargion, M. Yu. Khlopov, R. V. Konoplich

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 44%
Lecturer 1 11%
Professor 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 8 89%
Environmental Science 1 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2018.
All research outputs
#7,463,719
of 22,818,766 outputs
Outputs from Physics of Atomic Nuclei
#17
of 178 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,487
of 183,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physics of Atomic Nuclei
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,818,766 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 178 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.