↓ Skip to main content

Unstructured Formulation Data Analysis for the Optimization of Lipid Nanoparticle Drug Delivery Vehicles

Overview of attention for article published in AAPS PharmSciTech, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Unstructured Formulation Data Analysis for the Optimization of Lipid Nanoparticle Drug Delivery Vehicles
Published in
AAPS PharmSciTech, June 2018
DOI 10.1208/s12249-018-1078-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica Silva, Maria Mendes, Tânia Cova, João Sousa, Alberto Pais, Carla Vitorino

Abstract

Designing nanoparticle formulations with features tailored to their therapeutic targets in demanding timelines assumes increased importance. In this context, nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) offer an excellent example of a drug delivery nanosystem that has been broadly explored in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Distinct fundamental NLC quality attributes can be harnessed to fit this purpose, namely particle size, size distribution, and zeta potential. These critical aspects intrinsically depend on the formulation components, influencing drug loading capacity, drug release, and stability of the NLCs. Wide variations in their composition, including the type of lipids and other surface modifier excipients, lead to differences on these parameters. NLC target product profile involves small mean particle sizes, narrow size distributions, and absolute values of zeta potential higher than 30 mV. In this work, a wealth of data previously obtained in experiments on NLC preparation, encompassing, e.g., results of preliminary studies and those of intermediate formulations, is analyzed in order to extract information useful in further optimization studies. Principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least squares (PLS) are performed to evaluate the influence of NLC composition on the respective characteristics. These methods provide a rapid and discriminatory analysis for establishing a preformulation framework, by selecting the most suitable types of lipids, surfactants, surface modifiers, and drugs, within the set of investigated variables. The results have direct implications in the optimization of formulation and processes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 26%
Student > Master 5 16%
Researcher 3 10%
Professor 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 11 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 32%
Chemistry 4 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2021.
All research outputs
#7,322,668
of 23,088,369 outputs
Outputs from AAPS PharmSciTech
#424
of 1,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,602
of 329,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AAPS PharmSciTech
#10
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,088,369 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,476 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.