↓ Skip to main content

Shrub-Steppe Early Succession Following Juniper Cutting and Prescribed Fire

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Management, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Shrub-Steppe Early Succession Following Juniper Cutting and Prescribed Fire
Published in
Environmental Management, February 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00267-011-9629-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan D. Bates, Kirk W. Davies, Robert N. Sharp

Abstract

Pinus-Juniperus L. (Piñon-juniper) woodlands of the western United States have expanded in area nearly 10-fold since the late 1800's. Juniperus occidentalis ssp. occidentalis Hook. (western juniper) dominance in sagebrush steppe has several negative consequences, including reductions in herbaceous production and diversity, decreased wildlife habitat, and higher erosion and runoff potentials. Prescribed fire and mechanical tree removal are the main methods used to control J. occidentalis and restore sagebrush steppe. However, mature woodlands become difficult to prescribe burn because of the lack of understory fuels. We evaluated partial cutting of the woodlands (cutting 25-50% of the trees) to increase surface fuels, followed by prescribed fire treatments in late successional J. occidentalis woodlands of southwest Idaho to assess understory recovery. The study was conducted in two different plant associations and evaluated what percentage of the woodland required preparatory cutting to eliminate remaining J. occidentalis by prescribed fire, determined the impacts of fire to understory species, and examined early post-fire successional dynamics. The study demonstrated that late successional J. occidentalis woodlands can be burned after pre-cutting only a portion of the trees. Early succession in the cut-and-burn treatments were dominated by native annual and perennial forbs, in part due to high mortality of perennial bunchgrasses. By the third year after fire the number of establishing perennial grass seedlings indicated that both associations would achieve full herbaceous recovery. Cutting-prescribed fire combinations are an effective means for controlling encroaching late successional J. occidentalis and restoring herbaceous plant communities. However, land managers should recognize that there are potential problems associated with cutting-prescribed fire applications when invasive weeds are present.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 5%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Indonesia 1 1%
Unknown 68 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 31%
Researcher 15 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 4 5%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 43%
Environmental Science 17 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 8%
Engineering 2 3%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 11 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2011.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Management
#1,476
of 1,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,008
of 119,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Management
#18
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.