↓ Skip to main content

Developmental dynamics of early reading skill, literacy interest and readers’ self-concept within the first year of formal schooling

Overview of attention for article published in Reading and Writing, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
Title
Developmental dynamics of early reading skill, literacy interest and readers’ self-concept within the first year of formal schooling
Published in
Reading and Writing, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11145-018-9843-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bente Rigmor Walgermo, Njål Foldnes, Per Henning Uppstad, Oddny Judith Solheim

Abstract

Previous studies have documented robust relationships between emergent literacy and later reading performance. A growing body of research has also reported associations between motivational factors and reading in early phases of reading development. However, there is less research about cross-lagged relationships between motivational factors and reading skills in beginning readers. To examine relationships between early reading skills, literacy interest and reader self-concept, we tested 1141 children twice during their first year of formal reading instruction in school. Cross-lagged analysis showed strong stability in reading skills and medium stability in literacy interest and reader self-concept over the first school year. We also found bidirectional relationships between reading skills and self-concept and between the motivational components of literacy interest and reader self-concept. In the final part of the article, we address the potential theoretical progress attainable through the use of cross-lagged designs in this field.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 112 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Student > Master 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Lecturer 6 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 3%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 63 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 9%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Arts and Humanities 7 6%
Linguistics 6 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 62 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2018.
All research outputs
#15,052,229
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Reading and Writing
#494
of 797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,450
of 330,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reading and Writing
#11
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 797 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.