↓ Skip to main content

Comprehensive transcriptome and improved genome annotation of Bacillus licheniformis WX‐02

Overview of attention for article published in Febs Letters, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comprehensive transcriptome and improved genome annotation of Bacillus licheniformis WX‐02
Published in
Febs Letters, July 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.febslet.2015.07.029
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jing Guo, Gang Cheng, Xiang-Yong Gou, Feng Xing, Sen Li, Yi-Chao Han, Long Wang, Jia-Ming Song, Cheng-Cheng Shu, Shou-Wen Chen, Ling-Ling Chen

Abstract

The updated genome of Bacillus licheniformis WX-02 comprises a circular chromosome of 4,286,821 base-pairs containing 4,512 protein-coding genes. We applied strand-specific RNA-sequencing to explore the transcriptome profiles of Bacillus licheniformis WX-02 under normal and high-salt conditions (NaCl 6%). We identified 2,381 co-expressed gene pairs constituting 871 operon structures. In addition, 1,169 antisense transcripts and 90 small RNAs were detected. Systematic comparison of differentially expressed genes under different conditions revealed that genes involved in multiple functions were significantly repressed in long-term high salt adaptation process. Genes related to promotion of glutamic acid synthesis were activated by 6% NaCl, potentially explaining the high yield of γ-PGA under salt condition. This study will be useful for the optimization of crucial metabolic activities in this bacterium.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 28%
Student > Master 4 16%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 5 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 16%
Engineering 2 8%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2023.
All research outputs
#7,212,870
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Febs Letters
#4,536
of 14,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,351
of 275,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Febs Letters
#19
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,379 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,518 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.