↓ Skip to main content

Auditing Operating Room Recycling

Overview of attention for article published in A&A Case Reports, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 236)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Auditing Operating Room Recycling
Published in
A&A Case Reports, August 2015
DOI 10.1213/xaa.0000000000000097
Pubmed ID
Authors

Forbes McGain, Katherine Maria Jarosz, Martin Ngoc Hoai Huong Nguyen, Samantha Bates, Catherine Jane O’Shea

Abstract

Much waste arises from operating rooms (ORs). We estimated the practical and financial feasibility of an OR recycling program, weighing all waste from 6 ORs in Melbourne, Australia. Over 1 week, 237 operations produced 1265 kg in total: general waste 570 kg (45%), infectious waste 410 kg (32%), and recyclables 285 kg (23%). The achieved recycling had no infectious contamination. The achieved recycling/potential recycling rate was 285 kg/517 kg (55%). The average waste disposal costs were similar for general waste and recycling. OR recycling rates of 20%-25% total waste were achievable without compromising infection control or financial constraints.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Postgraduate 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 22 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 25 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2018.
All research outputs
#4,369,297
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from A&A Case Reports
#14
of 236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,438
of 276,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from A&A Case Reports
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 236 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.