↓ Skip to main content

Quantifying intra‐ and inter‐fractional motion in breast radiotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quantifying intra‐ and inter‐fractional motion in breast radiotherapy
Published in
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/jmrs.61
Pubmed ID
Authors

Scott Jones, Rhys Fitzgerald, Rebecca Owen, Jonathan Ramsay

Abstract

The magnitude of intra- and inter-fractional variation in the set up of breast cancer patients treated with tangential megavoltage photon beams was investigated using an electronic portal imaging device (EPID). Daily cine-EPID images were captured during delivery of the tangential fields for ten breast cancer patients treated in the supine position. Measurements collected from each image included the central lung distance (CLD), central flash distance (CFD), superior axial measurement (SAM) and the inferior axial measurement (IAM). The variation of motion within a fraction (intra-fraction) and the variation between fractions (inter-fraction) was analysed to quantify set up variation and motion due to respiration. Altogether 3775 EPID images were collected from 10 patients. The effect of respiratory motion during treatment was <0.1 cm standard deviation (SD) in the anterior-posterior (AP) direction. The inter-fraction movement caused by variations in daily set up was larger at 0.28 cm SD in the AP direction. Superior-inferior (SI) variation was more difficult to summarise and proved unreliable as the measurements were taken to an ambiguous point on the images. It was difficult to discern true SI movement from that implicated by AP movement. There is minimal intra-fractional chest wall motion due to respiration during treatment. Inter-fractional variation was larger, however, on average it remained within departmental tolerance (0.5 cm) for set up variations. This review of our current breast technique provides confidence in the feasibility of utilising advanced treatment techniques (field-in-field, intensity modulated radiotherapy or volumetric modulated arc therapy) following a review of the current imaging protocol.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 1 3%
Unknown 34 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Researcher 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 8 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 20%
Physics and Astronomy 7 20%
Engineering 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 10 29%