↓ Skip to main content

Expression of the microRNA regulators Drosha, Dicer and Ago2 in non-small cell lung carcinomas

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular Oncology, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Expression of the microRNA regulators Drosha, Dicer and Ago2 in non-small cell lung carcinomas
Published in
Cellular Oncology, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13402-015-0231-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

E. Prodromaki, A. Korpetinou, E. Giannopoulou, E. Vlotinou, Μ. Chatziathanasiadou, N. I. Papachristou, C. D. Scopa, H. Papadaki, H. P. Kalofonos, D. J. Papachristou

Abstract

MicroRNAs are evolutionarily conserved non-coding components of the transcriptome that can post-transcriptionally control gene expression. Altered microRNA expression has been found to be a common feature of several cancers, including lung carcinomas. The biogenesis and maturation of microRNAs is known to be mediated by the ribonucleases Drosha, Dicer and Ago2. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the expression and distribution of Drosha, Dicer and Ago2 in human non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLC) and to relate the respective expression patterns to clinocopatholical features. We used five human NSCLC-derived cell lines and primary formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples from 83 NSCLC patients. Drosha, Dicer and Ago2 mRNA and protein expression levels, and their sub-cellular distributions, were assessed using RT-PCR, Western blotting, immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry, respectively. We found that Drosha, Dicer and Ago2 were expressed in all the cell lines and primary neoplastic and non-neoplastic tissue samples tested. The intensity of the immunohistochemical staining was found to be significantly lower in stage I tumors compared to normal lung tissues. Dicer expression was found to be significantly higher in stage II compared to stage I tumors, and in stage III compared to stage II and stage I tumors. Our results point at a role of Drosha, Dicer and Ago2 in the development of NSCLC and suggest that Dicer may be implicated in the progression of these tumors to advanced stages.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 27%
Student > Bachelor 5 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 5 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2015.
All research outputs
#7,438,006
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from Cellular Oncology
#61
of 426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,793
of 266,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular Oncology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 426 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,371 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them