| Title |
Primär kutane Lymphome – eine Fallserie von 163 Patienten
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Die Dermatologie, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00105-018-4212-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
D. Nashan, C. M. Friedrich, E. Geissler, A. Schmitt-Graeff, F. Klein, F. Meiss |
| Abstract |
In addition to a broad and clinically diverse spectrum of known primary cutaneous lymphomas, for which an incidence of 1-3:100,000 is postulated, each year further entities are specified and defined. The goal is the presentation of a case series from daily clinical routine. Over a period of 6 years and 2 months, patients consulting the Department of Dermatology, Medical Center University of Freiburg, were registered. Subsequently, collectives of mycosis fungoides (MF), Sezary syndrome (SS), CD30+ lymphoproliferative diseases, single cases with rare primary cutaneous lymphomas, and subcollectives of B‑cell lymphomas were examined. The high number of MF cases allowed the additional quantitative analyses of the types of therapies used in this group. Yearly 16-25 new diagnoses of primary cutaneous lymphoma are made. The evaluation of 163 primary cutaneous lymphoma revealed 111 cases with MF (68.1%), including 9 particular variants, 15 primary cutaneous CD30+ lymphoproliferative diseases (9.2%) dominated by 10 lymphomatoid papulosis (LyP), in addition to 5 primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (PCALCL), 6 SS (3.68%), and 24 cutaneous B‑cell lymphomas (14-72%). Three cases with rare primary cutaneous T/NK cell lymphomas are addressed in detail. In all, 82% of MF cases were stage IA and IB. The descending use of therapies for stage I-III included steroids and diverse UV therapies followed by bexarotene, interferon-α, methotrexate, and extracorporal photophoresis. Diagnoses of cutaneous lymphomas belong to a vast spectrum of differential diagnoses. This registry describes frequent findings and shows rare variants. You can only diagnose what you know; accordingly, a collection of case reports, which we wish to encourage, can help in processing and specification of entities. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 20% |
| Researcher | 1 | 20% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2018.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Die Dermatologie
#489
of 689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,841
of 342,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Die Dermatologie
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 689 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.