↓ Skip to main content

Patient Satisfaction After Total Knee Replacement: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in HSS Journal®, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 504)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
30 X users
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
289 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
424 Mendeley
Title
Patient Satisfaction After Total Knee Replacement: A Systematic Review
Published in
HSS Journal®, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11420-018-9614-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cynthia A. Kahlenberg, Benedict U. Nwachukwu, Alexander S. McLawhorn, Michael B. Cross, Charles N. Cornell, Douglas E. Padgett

Abstract

The quality and state of satisfaction reporting after total knee replacement (TKR) is variable. The purposes of this systematic review were (1) to examine the available literature on patient satisfaction after TKR, (2) to evaluate the quality of available evidence, and (3) to identify predictors of patient satisfaction after TKR. A systematic review of the MEDLINE database was performed. The initial search yielded 1219 studies. The inclusion criteria were English language, clinical outcome study with primary outcome related to TKR for osteoarthritis, and patient-reported satisfaction included as an outcome measure. Studies were assessed for demographics, methodology for reporting satisfaction, and factors influencing satisfaction. Two hundred eight studies, including 95,560 patients who had undergone TKR, met all inclusion and exclusion criteria; 112 (53.8%) of these studies were published in the past 3 years. Satisfaction was most commonly measured using an ordinal scale. Twenty-seven studies (13%) used a validated satisfaction survey. Eighty-three percent of studies reported more than 80% satisfaction. The most commonly reported predictor of satisfaction was post-operative patient-reported functional outcome. Pre-operative anxiety/depression was the most common pre-operative predictor of dissatisfaction. There are numerous studies reporting patient satisfaction after TKR, and publication on the topic has been increasing over the past decade. However, the majority of studies represent lower levels of evidence and use heterogeneous methods for measuring satisfaction, and few studies use validated satisfaction instruments. In general, the majority of studies report satisfaction rates ranging from 80 to 100%, with post-operative functional outcome and relief of pain being paramount determinants for achieving satisfaction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 424 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 424 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 12%
Researcher 43 10%
Student > Bachelor 38 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 8%
Other 30 7%
Other 76 18%
Unknown 155 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 124 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 9%
Engineering 19 4%
Psychology 10 2%
Sports and Recreations 7 2%
Other 40 9%
Unknown 184 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2024.
All research outputs
#630,611
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from HSS Journal®
#5
of 504 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,700
of 344,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HSS Journal®
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 504 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them