↓ Skip to main content

Orienting to Medicine: Scripting Professionalism, Hierarchy, and Social Difference at the Start of Medical School

Overview of attention for article published in Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
Orienting to Medicine: Scripting Professionalism, Hierarchy, and Social Difference at the Start of Medical School
Published in
Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11013-018-9580-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sienna R. Craig, Rebekah Scott, Kristy Blackwood

Abstract

Nascent medical students' first view into medical school orients them toward what is considered important in medicine. Based on ethnography conducted over 18 months at a New England medical school, this article explores themes which emerged during a first-year student orientation and examines how these scripts resurface across a four-year curriculum, revealing dynamics of enculturation into an institution and the broader profession. We analyze orientation activities as discursive and embodied fields which serve "practical" purposes of making new social geographies familiar, but which also frame institutional values surrounding "soft" aspects of medicine: professionalism; dynamics of hierarchy and vulnerability; and social difference. By examining orientation and connecting these insights to later, discerning educational moments, we argue that orientation reveals tensions between the overt and hidden curricula within medical education, including what being a good doctor means. Our findings are based on data from semi-structured interviews, focus groups, and participant-observation in didactic and clinical settings. This article answers calls within medical anthropology and medical education literature to recognize implicit values at play in producing physicians, unearthing ethnographically how these values are learned longitudinally via persisting gaps between formal and hidden curricula. Assumptions hidden in plain sight call for ongoing medical education reform.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 9 13%
Researcher 8 11%
Other 5 7%
Librarian 4 6%
Professor 4 6%
Other 14 20%
Unknown 27 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 23%
Social Sciences 8 11%
Psychology 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 30 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2018.
All research outputs
#3,028,953
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry
#186
of 643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,890
of 340,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 643 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.