You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical characteristics and therapeutic responses in patients with germ-line AIP mutations and pituitary adenomas: an international collaborative study.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JCEM, August 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1210/jc.2009-2556 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adrian F Daly, Maria A Tichomirowa, Patrick Petrossians, Elina Heliövaara, Marie-Lise Jaffrain-Rea, Anne Barlier, Luciana A Naves, Tapani Ebeling, Auli Karhu, Antti Raappana, Laure Cazabat, Ernesto De Menis, Carmen Fajardo Montañana, Gerald Raverot, Robert J Weil, Timo Sane, Dominique Maiter, Sebastian Neggers, Maria Yaneva, Antoine Tabarin, Elisa Verrua, Eija Eloranta, Arnaud Murat, Outi Vierimaa, Pasi I Salmela, Philippe Emy, Rodrigo A Toledo, Maria Isabel Sabaté, Chiara Villa, Marc Popelier, Roberto Salvatori, Juliet Jennings, Angel Ferrandez Longás, José Ignacio Labarta Aizpún, Marianthi Georgitsi, Ralf Paschke, Cristina Ronchi, Matti Valimaki, Carola Saloranta, Wouter De Herder, Renato Cozzi, Mirtha Guitelman, Flavia Magri, Maria Stefania Lagonigro, Georges Halaby, Vinciane Corman, Marie-Thérèse Hagelstein, Jean-François Vanbellinghen, Gustavo Barcelos Barra, Anne-Paule Gimenez-Roqueplo, Fergus J Cameron, Françoise Borson-Chazot, Ian Holdaway, Sergio P A Toledo, Günter K Stalla, Anna Spada, Sabina Zacharieva, Jerome Bertherat, Thierry Brue, Vincent Bours, Philippe Chanson, Lauri A Aaltonen, Albert Beckers |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Romania | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 133 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 40 | 29% |
| Unknown | 28 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 45% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 35 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2018.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from JCEM
#6,504
of 15,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,014
of 104,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JCEM
#54
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,434 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,063 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.