↓ Skip to main content

Social Relationships in the Church during Late Life: Assessing Differences between African Americans, Whites, and Mexican Americans

Overview of attention for article published in Review of Religious Research, July 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Social Relationships in the Church during Late Life: Assessing Differences between African Americans, Whites, and Mexican Americans
Published in
Review of Religious Research, July 2023
DOI 10.1007/s13644-011-0008-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neal Krause, Elena Bastida

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to see if there are differences in the social relationships that older African Americans, older whites, and older Mexican Americans form with the people where they worship. Data from two nationwide surveys are pooled to see if race differences emerge in eleven different measures of church-based social relationships. These measures assess social relationships with rank-and-file church members as well as social relationships with members of the clergy. The findings reveal that older African Americans tend to have more well-developed social relationships in the church than either older whites or older Mexican Americans. This is true with respect to relationships with fellow church members as well as relationships with the clergy. In contrast, relatively few differences emerged between older Americans of European descent and older Mexican Americans. However, when differences emerged in the data, older whites tend to score higher on the support measures than older Mexican Americans.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 6%
Unknown 16 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 29%
Professor 3 18%
Researcher 3 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 2 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 7 41%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 12%
Linguistics 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 3 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2011.
All research outputs
#16,046,765
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Review of Religious Research
#225
of 357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,744
of 359,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Review of Religious Research
#84
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 357 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.