↓ Skip to main content

Forecasting the accuracy of genomic prediction with different selection targets in the training and prediction set as well as truncation selection

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical and Applied Genetics, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Forecasting the accuracy of genomic prediction with different selection targets in the training and prediction set as well as truncation selection
Published in
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00122-015-2577-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pascal Schopp, Christian Riedelsheimer, H. Friedrich Utz, Chris-Carolin Schön, Albrecht E. Melchinger

Abstract

Deterministic formulas accurately forecast the decline in predictive ability of genomic prediction with changing testers, target environments or traits and truncation selection. Genomic prediction of testcross performance (TP) was found to be a promising selection tool in hybrid breeding as long as the same tester and environments are used in the training and prediction set. In practice, however, selection targets often change in terms of testers, target environments or traits leading to a reduced predictive ability. Hence, it would be desirable to estimate for given training data the expected decline in the predictive ability of genomic prediction under such settings by deterministic formulas that require only quantitative genetic parameters available from the breeding program. Here, we derived formulas for forecasting the predictive ability under different selection targets in the training and prediction set and applied these to predict the TP of lines based on line per se or testcross evaluations. On the basis of two experiments with maize, we validated our approach in four scenarios characterized by different selection targets. Forecasted and empirically observed predictive abilities obtained by cross-validation generally agreed well, with deviations between -0.06 and 0.01 only. Applying the prediction model to a different tester and/or year reduced the predictive ability by not more than 18 %. Accounting additionally for truncation selection in our formulas indicated a substantial reduction in predictive ability in the prediction set, amounting, e.g., to 53 % for a selected fraction α = 10 %. In conclusion, our deterministic formulas enable forecasting the predictive abilities of new selection targets with sufficient precision and could be used to calculate parameters required for optimizing the allocation of resources in multi-stage genomic selection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 45 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 28%
Researcher 11 23%
Student > Master 8 17%
Professor 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 3 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 70%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 9%
Computer Science 2 4%
Mathematics 1 2%
Materials Science 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 5 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2015.
All research outputs
#19,201,293
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#3,124
of 3,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,047
of 265,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#22
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,565 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.