| Title |
Extending Causality Tests with Genetic Instruments: An Integration of Mendelian Randomization with the Classical Twin Design
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Behavior Genetics, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10519-018-9904-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Camelia C. Minică, Conor V. Dolan, Dorret I. Boomsma, Eco de Geus, Michael C. Neale |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 6 | 23% |
| United States | 4 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Denmark | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 58% |
| Scientists | 7 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 81 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 23% |
| Researcher | 15 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 21 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 19 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 7% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 27 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,508,617
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Genetics
#129
of 1,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,729
of 346,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Genetics
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,012 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.