↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of chemotherapy or chemo‐anti‐PD‐1 combination after failed anti‐PD‐1 therapy for relapsed and refractory hodgkin lymphoma: A series from lysa centers

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Hematology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy of chemotherapy or chemo‐anti‐PD‐1 combination after failed anti‐PD‐1 therapy for relapsed and refractory hodgkin lymphoma: A series from lysa centers
Published in
American Journal of Hematology, August 2018
DOI 10.1002/ajh.25154
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cédric Rossi, Julia Gilhodes, Marie Maerevoet, Charles Herbaux, Franck Morschhauser, Pauline Brice, Sylvain Garciaz, Cécile Borel, Loïc Ysebaert, Lucie Obéric, Julien Lazarovici, Bénédicte Deau, Jehan Dupuis, Adrien Chauchet, Julie Abraham, Fontanet Bijou, Aspasia Stamatoullas‐Bastard, Jean‐Valère Malfuson, Camille Golfier, Camille Laurent, Sarah Pericart, Alexandra Traverse‐Glehen, Salim Kanoun, Thomas Filleron, René‐Olivier Casasnovas, Hervé Ghesquières

Abstract

Anti-PD-1 therapy provides high response rates in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients who have relapsed or are refractory (R/R) to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and brentuximab vedotin (BV), but median progression free survival (PFS) is only one year. The efficacy of treatment following anti-PD-1 is not well known. We retrospectively investigated the efficacy of salvage therapies for unsatisfactory response to anti-PD-1 therapy, assessed by PET-CT according to the Lugano criteria, in 30 R/R HL patients. Patients were highly pre-treated before anti-PD-1 (70% received ASCT and 93% BV). Unsatisfactory responses to anti-PD1 therapy were progressive disease (PD) (n=24) and partial response (PR) (n=6). For the 24 PD patients, median anti-PD-1 related PFS was 7.5 months (95%CI, 5.7-11.6); 17 received subsequent CT alone (Group 1) and 7 received CT in addition to anti-PD-1 (Group 2). 16/24 patients (67%) obtained an objective response. In the 15 patients treated with the same CT, twelve obtained PR or complete response (CR). In Group 1, there were 7 CR (41%), 3 PR (18%), and 7 PD (41%). In Group 2, there were 4 CR (57%), 2 PR (29%), and 1 SD (14%). No unexpected toxicity was observed. Six patients who achieved response proceeded to allogeneic SCT. With a median follow-up of 12.1 months (7-14.7), the median PFS following the initiation of CT was 11 months (95%CI, 6.3; not reached) and the median of overall survival was not reached. These observations in highly pre-treated HL patients suggest that anti-PD-1 therapy might re-sensitize tumor cells to CT. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 16%
Other 9 15%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 22 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 25 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2018.
All research outputs
#5,725,277
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Hematology
#954
of 3,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,843
of 302,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Hematology
#18
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,430 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.