↓ Skip to main content

Why not be a desertist?

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Studies, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Why not be a desertist?
Published in
Philosophical Studies, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11098-018-1125-4
Authors

Huub Brouwer, Thomas Mulligan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Lecturer 2 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 5 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 7 32%
Social Sciences 6 27%
Arts and Humanities 2 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2022.
All research outputs
#15,547,925
of 23,106,934 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Studies
#691
of 1,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,294
of 328,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Studies
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,934 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,292 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,932 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.