You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention over time
Attention Score history
Activity
X Demographics
Mendeley demographics
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identification of novel mutational drivers reveals oncogene dependencies in multiple myeloma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Blood, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1182/blood-2018-03-840132 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brian A Walker, Konstantinos Mavrommatis, Christopher P Wardell, T Cody Ashby, Michael Bauer, Faith E Davies, Adam Rosenthal, Hongwei Wang, Pingping Qu, Antje Hoering, Mehmet Samur, Fadi Towfic, Maria Ortiz, Erin Flynt, Zhinuan Yu, Zhihong Yang, Dan Rozelle, John Obenauer, Matthew Trotter, Daniel Auclair, Jonathan Keats, Niccolo Bolli, Mariateresa Fulciniti, Raphael Szalat, Philippe Moreau, Brian Durie, A Keith Stewart, Hartmut Goldschmidt, Marc S Raab, Hermann Einsele, Pieter Sonneveld, Jesus San Miguel, Sagar Lonial, Graham H Jackson, Kenneth C Anderson, Herve Avet-Loiseau, Nikhil Munshi, Anjan Thakurta, Gareth J Morgan |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 31% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 14% |
| Spain | 3 | 7% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| France | 2 | 5% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 64% |
| Scientists | 11 | 26% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 364 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 364 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 54 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 9% |
| Other | 30 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 7% |
| Other | 58 | 16% |
| Unknown | 118 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 88 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 76 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 33 | 9% |
| Unknown | 132 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2024.
All research outputs
#1,736,165
of 33,002,763 outputs
Outputs from Blood
#1,747
of 43,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,340
of 364,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood
#34
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,002,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,816 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.