↓ Skip to main content

ICD-11 – Anpassung der ICD an das 21. Jahrhundert

Overview of attention for article published in Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
ICD-11 – Anpassung der ICD an das 21. Jahrhundert
Published in
Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00103-018-2755-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert Jakob

Abstract

In addition to medical innovations, the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) addresses the changing needs of digitized healthcare systems. This article describes the concept and developmental structure of the ICD-11.The new technical structure of the ICD-11 allows for a considerably simplified use of the classification and at the same time significantly improves the ability to record individual health conditions at the desired level of detail. The integration of the entire contents and structural information of the ICD-11 in an ontologically organized all-encompassing structure, the so called "foundation", in combination with the connected online platforms is a step into the future. It simplifies translation and maintenance of the classification and considerably improves consistency, especially between language versions. The foundation also permits the production of use-specific versions, so called linearisations, that facilitate the application of ICD by the relevant user groups.The ICD-11 allows versioning-safe documentation using a unique character string, the unique reference identifier. The ICD-11 has been designed for the current de facto use cases. The content of ICD-11 has been updated and linked to other classifications and terminologies. These innovations enable up-to-date documentation of relevant health information in all areas, aggregation of data and the analysis of examination of interrelationships in health.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 14%
Student > Master 4 11%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 9 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 26%
Psychology 5 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Social Sciences 3 9%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 10 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,863,946
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz
#119
of 945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,820
of 329,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz
#6
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 945 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.