↓ Skip to main content

Association between diabetes distress and all-cause mortality in Japanese individuals with type 2 diabetes: a prospective cohort study (Diabetes Distress and Care Registry in Tenri [DDCRT 18])

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetologia, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Association between diabetes distress and all-cause mortality in Japanese individuals with type 2 diabetes: a prospective cohort study (Diabetes Distress and Care Registry in Tenri [DDCRT 18])
Published in
Diabetologia, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00125-018-4657-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yasuaki Hayashino, Shintaro Okamura, Satoru Tsujii, Hitoshi Ishii, for the Diabetes Distress and Care Registry at Tenri Study Group

Abstract

The absence of data on the direct association between diabetes-specific distress and all-cause mortality in individuals with diabetes prompted us to examine the temporal association between Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) survey scores and the subsequent risk of all-cause mortality in a cohort of individuals with type 2 diabetes. Longitudinal data from 3305 individuals with diabetes were obtained from a large Japanese diabetes registry. Independent correlations between quintiles of PAID total scores or PAID scores of ≥40 and all-cause mortality (median follow-up of 6.1 years) were examined using Cox proportional hazards models with adjustment for potential confounders. The study population included 1280 women and 2025 men with a mean age of 64.9 years, BMI of 24.6 kg/m2 and HbA1c level of 58.7 mmol/mol (7.5%). In the multivariable-adjusted model, compared with the first quintile of PAID scores, the multivariable-adjusted HRs (95% CIs) for all-cause mortality for the second to fifth quintiles were 1.11 (0.77, 1.60; p = 0.56), 0.87 (0.56, 1.35; p = 0.524), 0.95 (0.63, 1.46; p = 0.802) and 1.60 (1.09, 2.36; p = 0.016), respectively. Compared with a PAID score of <40, the multivariable-adjusted HR for all-cause mortality of those with a score of ≥10 was 1.56 (95% CI 1.17, 2.08; p = 0.002). In subgroup analyses, the association between PAID score and all-cause mortality was found in men (HR 1.76; 95% CI 1.26, 2.46) but not in women (HR 1.09; 95% CI 0.60, 2.00), with a significant interaction between diabetes distress and sex (p = 0.0336). We observed a significant positive association between high diabetes distress and all-cause mortality in men with diabetes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Other 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 14 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 17 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2018.
All research outputs
#4,108,246
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#1,815
of 5,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,058
of 328,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#42
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,094 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.