↓ Skip to main content

Mutations in ARID2 are associated with intellectual disabilities

Overview of attention for article published in neurogenetics, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Mutations in ARID2 are associated with intellectual disabilities
Published in
neurogenetics, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10048-015-0454-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linshan Shang, Megan T. Cho, Kyle Retterer, Leandra Folk, Jennifer Humberson, Luis Rohena, Alpa Sidhu, Sheila Saliganan, Alejandro Iglesias, Patrik Vitazka, Jane Juusola, Anne H. O’Donnell-Luria, Yufeng Shen, Wendy K. Chung

Abstract

The etiology of intellectual disabilities (ID) remains unknown for the majority of patients. Due to reduced reproductive fitness in many individuals with ID, de novo mutations account for a significant portion of severe ID. The ATP-dependent SWI/SNF chromatin modifier has been linked with neurodevelopmental disorders including ID and autism. ARID2 is an intrinsic component of polybromo-associated BAF (PBAF), the SWI/SNF subcomplex. In this study, we used clinical whole exome sequencing (WES) in proband-parent-trios to identify the etiology of ID. We identified four independent, novel, loss of function variants in ARID2 gene in four patients, three of which were confirmed to be de novo. The patients all have ID and share other clinical characteristics including attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, short stature, dysmorphic facial features, and Wormian bones. All four novel variants are predicted to lead to a premature termination with the loss of the two conservative zinc finger motifs. This is the first report of mutations in ARID2 associated with developmental delay and ID.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 17%
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 12%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 23 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 12%
Psychology 9 10%
Sports and Recreations 4 5%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 25 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2015.
All research outputs
#5,888,070
of 22,818,766 outputs
Outputs from neurogenetics
#87
of 376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,252
of 264,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from neurogenetics
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,818,766 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 376 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.