↓ Skip to main content

Soft Ethics: Its Application to the General Data Protection Regulation and Its Dual Advantage

Overview of attention for article published in Knowledge In Society, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Soft Ethics: Its Application to the General Data Protection Regulation and Its Dual Advantage
Published in
Knowledge In Society, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s13347-018-0315-5
Authors

Luciano Floridi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 12 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 11 21%
Social Sciences 10 19%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 8%
Philosophy 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 13 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2018.
All research outputs
#20,726,252
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Knowledge In Society
#495
of 550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,454
of 343,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knowledge In Society
#8
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.