↓ Skip to main content

Effective conservation requires clear objectives and prioritizing actions, not places or species

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
67 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effective conservation requires clear objectives and prioritizing actions, not places or species
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, August 2015
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1509189112
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher J. Brown, Michael Bode, Oscar Venter, Megan D. Barnes, Jennifer McGowan, Claire A. Runge, James E. M. Watson, Hugh P. Possingham

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Brazil 4 2%
Germany 2 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 195 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 54 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 24%
Student > Master 25 12%
Other 12 6%
Student > Postgraduate 9 4%
Other 31 15%
Unknown 31 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 72 34%
Environmental Science 61 29%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 14 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 1%
Social Sciences 3 1%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 46 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,077,284
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#16,233
of 103,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,256
of 277,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#233
of 893 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,917 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 893 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.