You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Association analyses of more than 140,000 men identify 63 new prostate cancer susceptibility loci
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Genetics, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41588-018-0142-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fredrick R. Schumacher, Ali Amin Al Olama, Sonja I. Berndt, Sara Benlloch, Mahbubl Ahmed, Edward J. Saunders, Tokhir Dadaev, Daniel Leongamornlert, Ezequiel Anokian, Clara Cieza-Borrella, Chee Goh, Mark N. Brook, Xin Sheng, Laura Fachal, Joe Dennis, Jonathan Tyrer, Kenneth Muir, Artitaya Lophatananon, Victoria L. Stevens, Susan M. Gapstur, Brian D. Carter, Catherine M. Tangen, Phyllis J. Goodman, Ian M. Thompson, Jyotsna Batra, Suzanne Chambers, Leire Moya, Judith Clements, Lisa Horvath, Wayne Tilley, Gail P. Risbridger, Henrik Gronberg, Markus Aly, Tobias Nordström, Paul Pharoah, Nora Pashayan, Johanna Schleutker, Teuvo L. J. Tammela, Csilla Sipeky, Anssi Auvinen, Demetrius Albanes, Stephanie Weinstein, Alicja Wolk, Niclas Håkansson, Catharine M. L. West, Alison M. Dunning, Neil Burnet, Lorelei A. Mucci, Edward Giovannucci, Gerald L. Andriole, Olivier Cussenot, Géraldine Cancel-Tassin, Stella Koutros, Laura E. Beane Freeman, Karina Dalsgaard Sorensen, Torben Falck Orntoft, Michael Borre, Lovise Maehle, Eli Marie Grindedal, David E. Neal, Jenny L. Donovan, Freddie C. Hamdy, Richard M. Martin, Ruth C. Travis, Tim J. Key, Robert J. Hamilton, Neil E. Fleshner, Antonio Finelli, Sue Ann Ingles, Mariana C. Stern, Barry S. Rosenstein, Sarah L. Kerns, Harry Ostrer, Yong-Jie Lu, Hong-Wei Zhang, Ninghan Feng, Xueying Mao, Xin Guo, Guomin Wang, Zan Sun, Graham G. Giles, Melissa C. Southey, Robert J. MacInnis, Liesel M. FitzGerald, Adam S. Kibel, Bettina F. Drake, Ana Vega, Antonio Gómez-Caamaño, Robert Szulkin, Martin Eklund, Manolis Kogevinas, Javier Llorca, Gemma Castaño-Vinyals, Kathryn L. Penney, Meir Stampfer, Jong Y. Park, Thomas A. Sellers, Hui-Yi Lin, Janet L. Stanford, Cezary Cybulski, Dominika Wokolorczyk, Jan Lubinski, Elaine A. Ostrander, Milan S. Geybels, Børge G. Nordestgaard, Sune F. Nielsen, Maren Weischer, Rasmus Bisbjerg, Martin Andreas Røder, Peter Iversen, Hermann Brenner, Katarina Cuk, Bernd Holleczek, Christiane Maier, Manuel Luedeke, Thomas Schnoeller, Jeri Kim, Christopher J. Logothetis, Esther M. John, Manuel R. Teixeira, Paula Paulo, Marta Cardoso, Susan L. Neuhausen, Linda Steele, Yuan Chun Ding, Kim De Ruyck, Gert De Meerleer, Piet Ost, Azad Razack, Jasmine Lim, Soo-Hwang Teo, Daniel W. Lin, Lisa F. Newcomb, Davor Lessel, Marija Gamulin, Tomislav Kulis, Radka Kaneva, Nawaid Usmani, Sandeep Singhal, Chavdar Slavov, Vanio Mitev, Matthew Parliament, Frank Claessens, Steven Joniau, Thomas Van den Broeck, Samantha Larkin, Paul A. Townsend, Claire Aukim-Hastie, Manuela Gago-Dominguez, Jose Esteban Castelao, Maria Elena Martinez, Monique J. Roobol, Guido Jenster, Ron H. N. van Schaik, Florence Menegaux, Thérèse Truong, Yves Akoli Koudou, Jianfeng Xu, Kay-Tee Khaw, Lisa Cannon-Albright, Hardev Pandha, Agnieszka Michael, Stephen N. Thibodeau, Shannon K. McDonnell, Daniel J. Schaid, Sara Lindstrom, Constance Turman, Jing Ma, David J. Hunter, Elio Riboli, Afshan Siddiq, Federico Canzian, Laurence N. Kolonel, Loic Le Marchand, Robert N. Hoover, Mitchell J. Machiela, Zuxi Cui, Peter Kraft, Christopher I. Amos, David V. Conti, Douglas F. Easton, Fredrik Wiklund, Stephen J. Chanock, Brian E. Henderson, Zsofia Kote-Jarai, Christopher A. Haiman, Rosalind A. Eeles, The Profile Study, Australian Prostate Cancer BioResource (APCB), The IMPACT Study, Canary PASS Investigators, Breast and Prostate Cancer Cohort Consortium (BPC3), The PRACTICAL (Prostate Cancer Association Group to Investigate Cancer-Associated Alterations in the Genome) Consortium, Cancer of the Prostate in Sweden (CAPS), Prostate Cancer Genome-wide Association Study of Uncommon Susceptibility Loci (PEGASUS), The Genetic Associations and Mechanisms in Oncology (GAME-ON)/Elucidating Loci Involved in Prostate Cancer Susceptibility (ELLIPSE) Consortium |
| Abstract |
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and fine-mapping efforts to date have identified more than 100 prostate cancer (PrCa)-susceptibility loci. We meta-analyzed genotype data from a custom high-density array of 46,939 PrCa cases and 27,910 controls of European ancestry with previously genotyped data of 32,255 PrCa cases and 33,202 controls of European ancestry. Our analysis identified 62 novel loci associated (P < 5.0 × 10-8) with PrCa and one locus significantly associated with early-onset PrCa (≤55 years). Our findings include missense variants rs1800057 (odds ratio (OR) = 1.16; P = 8.2 × 10-9; G>C, p.Pro1054Arg) in ATM and rs2066827 (OR = 1.06; P = 2.3 × 10-9; T>G, p.Val109Gly) in CDKN1B. The combination of all loci captured 28.4% of the PrCa familial relative risk, and a polygenic risk score conferred an elevated PrCa risk for men in the ninetieth to ninety-ninth percentiles (relative risk = 2.69; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.55-2.82) and first percentile (relative risk = 5.71; 95% CI: 5.04-6.48) risk stratum compared with the population average. These findings improve risk prediction, enhance fine-mapping, and provide insight into the underlying biology of PrCa 1 . |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 213 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 67 | 31% |
| United Kingdom | 25 | 12% |
| Canada | 7 | 3% |
| Spain | 5 | 2% |
| Japan | 5 | 2% |
| Belgium | 3 | 1% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 3 | 1% |
| France | 3 | 1% |
| Australia | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 24 | 11% |
| Unknown | 68 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 119 | 56% |
| Scientists | 70 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 18 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 540 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 540 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 97 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 75 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 50 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 50 | 9% |
| Other | 28 | 5% |
| Other | 83 | 15% |
| Unknown | 157 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 112 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 111 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 57 | 11% |
| Mathematics | 8 | 1% |
| Engineering | 8 | 1% |
| Other | 56 | 10% |
| Unknown | 188 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 832. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2023.
All research outputs
#22,414
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#31
of 7,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#452
of 342,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#3
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.