| Title |
Experimental subaqueous burial of a bird carcass and compaction of plumage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PalZ, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12542-018-0411-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Evan T. Saitta, Charles Clapham, Jakob Vinther |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Ireland | 1 | 8% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 83% |
| Scientists | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 38% |
| Researcher | 3 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 56% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,975,953
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from PalZ
#36
of 686 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,588
of 341,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PalZ
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 686 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.