↓ Skip to main content

Changing trends of total knee replacement utilization over more than a decade

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Changing trends of total knee replacement utilization over more than a decade
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00590-015-1675-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Narinder Kumar, Bhawna Gupta, Santosh Kumar Singh

Abstract

Osteoarthritis of the knee causes significant disability amongst the elderly, and total knee replacement remains the only effective intervention for pain relief and functional improvement. Using data from single military healthcare institutional records in India, we estimated the utilization rates of total knee replacement by age, gender and rank profile. All the data were retrieved manually from institutional records as the institutional databases are yet to be digitized. The information on the study subjects was retrospectively retrieved from the records of the Department of Orthopaedics from the year 1997 to 2012. Trends were estimated by using two 6-year periods separated by a decade, i.e. 1997-2002 and 2007-2012. We estimated age-, gender- and rank-specific rates of TKR utilization in these years. From 1997 to 2002, 37 TKRs were performed as compared to 800 during 2007-2012, showing a more than 20 times increase. During 1997-2002, the mean age was 62.6 years (SD-9.224) compared to 65.8 years (SD-7.05). There was significant disparity in TKR utilization rates on the basis of rank with officers and their dependent, showing much higher utilization rates in both year groups which is possibly explained by the higher level of awareness about the procedure, higher education levels and higher acceptability of the procedure by the officers as compared to PBORs. The rate of TKR was marginally higher amongst women as compared to men. The TKR utilization rates have increased tremendously over a decade. In view of this huge increase, future planning is essential to enable optimal material and human resource allocation as well as training to meet future challenges.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 13%
Other 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Lecturer 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 15 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 7%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Philosophy 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 14 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2015.
All research outputs
#20,284,384
of 22,818,766 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#540
of 876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,970
of 264,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#13
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,818,766 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 876 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.