| Title |
The shuffling of mathematics problems improves learning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Instructional Science, April 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11251-007-9015-8 |
| Authors |
Doug Rohrer, Kelli Taylor |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 147 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 41 | 28% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Austria | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 92 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 146 | 99% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 337 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 323 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 66 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 41 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 12% |
| Researcher | 35 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 73 | 22% |
| Unknown | 67 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 102 | 30% |
| Social Sciences | 49 | 15% |
| Mathematics | 19 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 4% |
| Engineering | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 68 | 20% |
| Unknown | 73 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 160. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#260,173
of 25,756,911 outputs
Outputs from Instructional Science
#2
of 497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#350
of 88,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Instructional Science
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,911 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 497 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them