| Title |
To what extent do mesophotic coral ecosystems and shallow reefs share species of conservation interest? A systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Evidence, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13750-018-0127-1 |
| Authors |
Jack H. Laverick, Shanice Piango, Dominic A. Andradi-Brown, Dan A. Exton, Pim Bongaerts, Tom C. L. Bridge, Michael P. Lesser, Richard L. Pyle, Marc Slattery, Daniel Wagner, Alex D. Rogers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 26% |
| United States | 4 | 13% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| American Samoa | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 74% |
| Scientists | 8 | 26% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 128 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 19% |
| Researcher | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 29 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 43 | 34% |
| Environmental Science | 32 | 25% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 8% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 36 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,318,426
of 24,341,979 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#44
of 314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,952
of 332,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,341,979 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,440 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.