↓ Skip to main content

Influence of Geometry on the Drug Release Profiles of Stereolithographic (SLA) 3D-Printed Tablets

Overview of attention for article published in AAPS PharmSciTech, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
148 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
196 Mendeley
Title
Influence of Geometry on the Drug Release Profiles of Stereolithographic (SLA) 3D-Printed Tablets
Published in
AAPS PharmSciTech, June 2018
DOI 10.1208/s12249-018-1075-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pamela Robles Martinez, Alvaro Goyanes, Abdul W. Basit, Simon Gaisford

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (3D printing) permits the fabrication of tablets in shapes unattainable by powder compaction, and so the effects of geometry on drug release behavior is easily assessed. Here, tablets (printlets) comprising of paracetamol dispersed in polyethylene glycol were printed using stereolithographic 3D printing. A number of geometric shapes were produced (cube, disc, pyramid, sphere and torus) with either constant surface area (SA) or constant surface area/volume ratio (SA/V). Dissolution testing showed that printlets with constant SA/V ratio released drug at the same rate, while those with constant SA released drug at different rates. A series of tori with increasing SA/V ratio (from 0.5 to 2.4) were printed, and it was found that dissolution rate increased as the SA/V ratio increased. The data show that printlets can be fabricated in multiple shapes and that dissolution performance can be maintained if the SA/V ratio is constant or that dissolution performance of printlets can be fine-tuned by varying SA/V ratio. The results suggest that 3D printing is therefore a suitable manufacturing method for personalized dosage forms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 196 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 18%
Student > Master 26 13%
Student > Bachelor 22 11%
Researcher 17 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 3%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 73 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 54 28%
Engineering 22 11%
Materials Science 7 4%
Chemistry 6 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 3%
Other 16 8%
Unknown 85 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2023.
All research outputs
#4,537,134
of 24,814,419 outputs
Outputs from AAPS PharmSciTech
#166
of 1,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,789
of 334,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AAPS PharmSciTech
#1
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,814,419 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,555 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.