↓ Skip to main content

Production of bioproducts by endophytic fungi: chemical ecology, biotechnological applications, bottlenecks, and solutions

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
Title
Production of bioproducts by endophytic fungi: chemical ecology, biotechnological applications, bottlenecks, and solutions
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00253-018-9101-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lu Yan, Haobin Zhao, Xixi Zhao, Xiaoguang Xu, Yichao Di, Chunmei Jiang, Junling Shi, Dongyan Shao, Qingsheng Huang, Hui Yang, Mingliang Jin

Abstract

Endophytes are microorganisms that colonize the interior of host plants without causing apparent disease. They have been widely studied for their ability to modulate relationships between plants and biotic/abiotic stresses, often producing valuable secondary metabolites that can affect host physiology. Owing to the advantages of microbial fermentation over plant/cell cultivation and chemical synthesis, endophytic fungi have received significant attention as a mean for secondary metabolite production. This article summarizes currently reported results on plant-endophyte interaction hypotheses and highlights the biotechnological applications of endophytic fungi and their metabolites in agriculture, environment, biomedicine, energy, and biocatalysts. Current bottlenecks in industrial development and commercial applications as well as possible solutions are also discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 144 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 15%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Researcher 9 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 24 17%
Unknown 50 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 16%
Environmental Science 7 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 3%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 56 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2018.
All research outputs
#17,406,668
of 25,537,395 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#6,062
of 8,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,151
of 345,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#83
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,537,395 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,330 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.