↓ Skip to main content

Clinical review: intensive care unit acquired weakness

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
145 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
10 Facebook pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
469 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1130 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Clinical review: intensive care unit acquired weakness
Published in
Critical Care, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13054-015-0993-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Greet Hermans, Greet Van den Berghe

Abstract

A substantial number of patients admitted to the ICU because of an acute illness, complicated surgery, severe trauma, or burn injury will develop a de novo form of muscle weakness during the ICU stay that is referred to as "intensive care unit acquired weakness" (ICUAW). This ICUAW evoked by critical illness can be due to axonal neuropathy, primary myopathy, or both. Underlying pathophysiological mechanisms comprise microvascular, electrical, metabolic, and bioenergetic alterations, interacting in a complex way and culminating in loss of muscle strength and/or muscle atrophy. ICUAW is typically symmetrical and affects predominantly proximal limb muscles and respiratory muscles, whereas facial and ocular muscles are often spared. The main risk factors for ICUAW include high severity of illness upon admission, sepsis, multiple organ failure, prolonged immobilization, and hyperglycemia, and also older patients have a higher risk. The role of corticosteroids and neuromuscular blocking agents remains unclear. ICUAW is diagnosed in awake and cooperative patients by bedside manual testing of muscle strength and the severity is scored by the Medical Research Council sum score. In cases of atypical clinical presentation or evolution, additional electrophysiological testing may be required for differential diagnosis. The cornerstones of prevention are aggressive treatment of sepsis, early mobilization, preventing hyperglycemia with insulin, and avoiding the use parenteral nutrition during the first week of critical illness. Weak patients clearly have worse acute outcomes and consume more healthcare resources. Recovery usually occurs within weeks or months, although it may be incomplete with weakness persisting up to 2 years after ICU discharge. Prognosis appears compromised when the cause of ICUAW involves critical illness polyneuropathy, whereas isolated critical illness myopathy may have a better prognosis. In addition, ICUAW has shown to contribute to the risk of 1-year mortality. Future research should focus on new preventive and/or therapeutic strategies for this detrimental complication of critical illness and on clarifying how ICUAW contributes to poor longer-term prognosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 145 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 1117 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 158 14%
Student > Bachelor 156 14%
Other 98 9%
Student > Postgraduate 93 8%
Researcher 78 7%
Other 234 21%
Unknown 313 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 405 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 215 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 2%
Neuroscience 20 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 2%
Other 97 9%
Unknown 352 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 121. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2024.
All research outputs
#352,250
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#185
of 6,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,564
of 397,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#9
of 466 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,611 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,456 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 466 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.