↓ Skip to main content

The link between obesity and vitamin D in bariatric patients with omega-loop gastric bypass surgery - a vitamin D supplementation trial to compare the efficacy of postoperative cholecalciferol…

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
302 Mendeley
Title
The link between obesity and vitamin D in bariatric patients with omega-loop gastric bypass surgery - a vitamin D supplementation trial to compare the efficacy of postoperative cholecalciferol loading (LOAD): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, August 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13063-015-0877-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Luger, Renate Kruschitz, Rodrig Marculescu, Helmuth Haslacher, Friedrich Hoppichler, Enikö Kallay, Christian Kienbacher, Carmen Klammer, Melanie Kral, Felix Langer, Eva Luger, Gerhard Prager, Michael Trauner, Stefan Traussnigg, Tanja Würger, Karin Schindler, Bernhard Ludvik

Abstract

Beyond its classical role in calcium homoeostasis and bone metabolism, vitamin D deficiency has been found to be associated with several diseases, including diabetes, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and even obesity itself. Importantly, there are limited data on therapeutic strategies for vitamin D deficiency in bariatric patients, and the procedure-specific guidelines may not be sufficient. To improve long-term outcomes, nutritional screening and appropriate supplementation to prevent nutrient deficiencies are urgently needed. Therefore, the aim of this study is to examine effects and safety of a forced dosing regimen of vitamin D versus conventional dose supplementation on vitamin D levels and other parameters in bariatric patients. The study includes loading plus repeat dosing compared with repeated administration of vitamin D without a loading dose, according to guidelines, in a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Up to a triple oral loading dose is given on day 1, then 2 and 4 weeks after surgery (100,000 IU dose each time), followed by an oral maintenance dose (3420 IU/day). The control group (n = 25) will receive placebo, followed by administration of a standard dose (3420 IU/day). We hypothesize that a significant increase in vitamin D levels will occur in patients in the treatment group (n = 25) by 24 weeks after surgery. Further measurements are aimed at evaluating changes in inflammation, bone turnover, insulin resistance, blood pressure, liver, mental health, and gut microbiota of patients undergoing omega-loop gastric bypass surgery. Furthermore, possible associations between concentrations of vitamin D, the involved enzymes, or vitamin D receptor in adipose and/or liver tissues will be determined. To our knowledge, this trial is the first of its kind with this type of vitamin D supplementation in bariatric patients. Its major strength is the design and implementation of evaluation of influencing factors such as liver function, bone health, inflammation, insulin resistance, blood pressure, symptoms of depression, or microbiota. This alternative vitamin D dosing regimen has the potential to be a safe, fast, evidence-based treatment of vitamin D deficiency in bariatric patients. Owing to the increasing number of bariatric patients, it is also of interest to elucidate the link between obesity and vitamin D. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02092376 . Registered on 17 March 2014.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 302 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 301 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 18%
Student > Bachelor 54 18%
Researcher 26 9%
Student > Postgraduate 17 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 6%
Other 51 17%
Unknown 83 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 7%
Psychology 17 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 3%
Other 44 15%
Unknown 99 33%