↓ Skip to main content

Poorly Differentiated Carcinoma Component in Submucosal Layer Should be Considered as an Additional Criterion for Curative Endoscopic Resection of Early Gastric Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Poorly Differentiated Carcinoma Component in Submucosal Layer Should be Considered as an Additional Criterion for Curative Endoscopic Resection of Early Gastric Cancer
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, August 2015
DOI 10.1245/s10434-015-4794-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Da Hyun Jung, Yoon Sung Bae, Sun Och Yoon, Yong Chan Lee, Hoguen Kim, Sung Hoon Noh, Hyojin Park, Seung Ho Choi, Jie-Hyun Kim, Hyunki Kim

Abstract

Some studies have reported lymph node metastasis (LNM) in early gastric cancer (EGC) cases meeting the expanded criteria for endoscopic resection. Therefore, we investigated whether a minor poorly differentiated carcinoma (PDC) component in the submucosal (SM) layer affects LNM in differentiated EGC. We performed surgery in 1096 patients with differentiated SM gastric cancer and compared the clinicopathologic features of node-positive (n = 194) and node-negative (n = 902) differentiated SM cancer, with special reference to the portion of PDC component in the SM layer. When we categorized patients by the proportion of PDC component in the SM layer, we found 840 patients had <5 % and 256 patients had ≥5 % PDC components in the SM layer. The ≥5 % group was significantly associated with younger age, female sex, moderate differentiation, deep SM invasion, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), perineural invasion, and LNM. In multivariate analysis, middle third location, moderate differentiation, SM2 invasion, size >2 cm, LVI, and PDC components in the SM layer were independent risk factors for LNM. When we limited the depth of invasion to SM1, the incidence of LNM was significantly higher in the ≥5 % group. On multivariate analysis, tumor size >2 cm, moderate differentiation, LVI positivity, and ≥5 % PDC components in the SM1 layer were independent risk factors for LNM in SM1 cancer. The PDC component in the SM layer of differentiated EGC was an independent risk factor of LNM, which might constitute a supplementary criterion in the expanded indications for endoscopic resection in differentiated EGC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 29%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Librarian 1 6%
Researcher 1 6%
Student > Postgraduate 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Unknown 9 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2015.
All research outputs
#20,284,384
of 22,818,766 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#5,494
of 6,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,909
of 264,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#108
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,818,766 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,465 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.