↓ Skip to main content

Conjoint psychometric field estimation for bilateral audiometry

Overview of attention for article published in Behavior Research Methods, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Conjoint psychometric field estimation for bilateral audiometry
Published in
Behavior Research Methods, June 2018
DOI 10.3758/s13428-018-1062-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dennis L. Barbour, James C. DiLorenzo, Kiron A. Sukesan, Xinyu D. Song, Jeff Y. Chen, Eleanor A. Degen, Katherine L. Heisey, Roman Garnett

Abstract

Behavioral testing in perceptual or cognitive domains requires querying a subject multiple times in order to quantify his or her ability in the corresponding domain. These queries must be conducted sequentially, and any additional testing domains are also typically tested sequentially, such as with distinct tests comprising a test battery. As a result, existing behavioral tests are often lengthy and do not offer comprehensive evaluation. The use of active machine-learning kernel methods for behavioral assessment provides extremely flexible yet efficient estimation tools to more thoroughly investigate perceptual or cognitive processes without incurring the penalty of excessive testing time. Audiometry represents perhaps the simplest test case to demonstrate the utility of these techniques. In pure-tone audiometry, hearing is assessed in the two-dimensional input space of frequency and intensity, and the test is repeated for both ears. Although an individual's ears are not linked physiologically, they share many features in common that lead to correlations suitable for exploitation in testing. The bilateral audiogram estimates hearing thresholds in both ears simultaneously by conjoining their separate input domains into a single search space, which can be evaluated efficiently with modern machine-learning methods. The result is the introduction of the first conjoint psychometric function estimation procedure, which consistently delivers accurate results in significantly less time than sequential disjoint estimators.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 27%
Student > Bachelor 3 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Unspecified 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 4 27%
Computer Science 3 20%
Unspecified 1 7%
Psychology 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 3 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Research Methods
#2,100
of 2,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#299,629
of 341,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Research Methods
#34
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,526 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,509 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.