↓ Skip to main content

Copper(II)-Bis(Thiosemicarbazonato) Complexes as Antibacterial Agents: Insights into Their Mode of Action and Potential as Therapeutics

Overview of attention for article published in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Copper(II)-Bis(Thiosemicarbazonato) Complexes as Antibacterial Agents: Insights into Their Mode of Action and Potential as Therapeutics
Published in
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, August 2015
DOI 10.1128/aac.01289-15
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karrera Y. Djoko, Maira M. Goytia, Paul S. Donnelly, Mark A. Schembri, William M. Shafer, Alastair G. McEwan

Abstract

There is increasing interest in the use of lipophilic copper (Cu)-containing complexes to combat bacterial infections. In this work, we showed that Cu complexes with bis(thiosemicarbazone) ligands [Cu(btsc)] exert antibacterial activity against a range of medically significant pathogens. Previous work using Neisseria gonorrhoeae showed that Cu(btsc) complexes may act as inhibitors of respiratory dehydrogenases of the electron transport chain. We now show that these complexes are also toxic against a range of bacterial pathogens some of which lack a respiratory chain. Respiration in Escherichia coli was slightly affected by Cu(btsc) complexes but our results indicate that, in this model bacterium, the complexes act primarily as agents that deliver toxic Cu ions efficiently to the cytoplasm. Although the chemistry of Cu(btsc) complexes may dictate their mechanism of action, their efficacy depends highly on bacterial physiology which is linked to the ability of the bacterium to tolerate Cu and additionally, the susceptibility of the respiratory chain to direct inhibition by Cu(btsc) complexes. The physiology of N. gonorrhoeae, including multidrug-resistant strains, makes it highly susceptible to damage by Cu ions and Cu(btsc) complexes, highlighting the potential of Cu(btsc) complexes as a potential treatment against this significant bacterial pathogen.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 92 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Other 6 6%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 29 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 18 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 4%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 32 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2016.
All research outputs
#22,756,649
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
#14,746
of 15,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,774
of 275,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
#194
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,580 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.