↓ Skip to main content

Diagnostic delay in hidradenitis suppurativa is a global problem

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Dermatology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
263 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diagnostic delay in hidradenitis suppurativa is a global problem
Published in
British Journal of Dermatology, November 2015
DOI 10.1111/bjd.14038
Pubmed ID
Authors

D.M. Saunte, J. Boer, A. Stratigos, J.C. Szepietowski, I. Hamzavi, K.H. Kim, K. Zarchi, C. Antoniou, L. Matusiak, H.W. Lim, M. Williams, H.H. Kwon, M.A. Gürer, F. Mammadova, A. Kaminsky, E. Prens, H.H. van der Zee, V. Bettoli, S. Zauli, J. Hafner, S. Lauchli, L.E. French, H. Riad, M. El‐Domyati, H. Abdel‐Wahab, B. Kirby, G. Kelly, P. Calderon, V. del Marmol, F. Benhadou, J. Revuz, C.C. Zouboulis, I. Karagiannidis, K. Sartorius, L. Hagströmer, E. McMeniman, N. Ong, M. Dolenc‐Voljc, Z.B. Mokos, L. Borradori, R.E. Hunger, C. Sladden, N. Scheinfeld, N. Moftah, L. Emtestam, J. Lapins, N. Doss, I. Kurokawa, G.B.E. Jemec

Abstract

DM Saunte was paid as a consultant for advisory board meeting by AbbVie and as a speaker for Bayer, Galderma, Astellas, and Leo Pharma. A Stratigos was paid as a consultant for board meetings, speaker and received a research grant as an investigator for AbbVie, MSD and Pfizer. JC Szepietowski was paid as a consultant and speaker for Abbvie. I Hamzavi received investigator grants from MicroDermis and AbbVie. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 198 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 23 12%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Student > Master 17 9%
Researcher 16 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Other 32 16%
Unknown 78 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 80 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 85 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,104,131
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Dermatology
#288
of 9,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,664
of 296,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Dermatology
#7
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.