↓ Skip to main content

Electron microscopy of particles deposited in the lungs of nickel refinery workers

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Electron microscopy of particles deposited in the lungs of nickel refinery workers
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00216-015-8806-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miriam Küpper, Stephan Weinbruch, Vidar Skaug, Asbjørn Skogstad, Elín Einarsdóttir Thornér, Nathalie Benker, Martin Ebert, Valery Chashchin, Jon Øyvind Odland, Yngvar Thomassen

Abstract

The size, morphology, and chemical composition of particles deposited in the lungs of two nickel refinery workers were studied by scanning and transmission electron microscopy. The particles were extracted from the lung tissue by low-temperature ashing or by dissolution in tetramethylammonium hydroxide. The suitability of both sample preparation techniques was checked with reference materials. Both approaches lead to Fe-rich artifact particles. Low-temperature ashing leads to oxidation of small (diameter < 2 μm) metallic Ni and Ni sulfide particles, dissolution in tetramethylammonium hydroxide to removal of sulfate surface layers. Silicates and alumosilicates are the most abundant particle groups in the lungs of both subjects. From the various metal-dominated particle groups, Ni-rich particles are most abundant followed by Fe-rich and Ti-rich particles. Ni appears to be present predominantly as an oxide. Pure Ni metal and Ni sulfides were not observed. The presence of soluble Ni phases was not investigated as they will not be preserved during sample preparation. Based on their spherical morphology, it is estimated that a large fraction of Ni-rich particles (50-60 % by number) as well as Fe-rich and Cu-rich particles (27-45 %) originate from high-temperature processes (smelting, welding). This fraction is much lower for silicates (3-5 %), alumosilicates (1-2 %), and Ti-rich particles (9-11 %). The absence of metallic Ni particles most likely results from low exposure to this species. The absence of Ni sulfides may be either ascribed to low exposure or to fast clearance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 5%
Unknown 21 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Lecturer 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Professor 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 9 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 5 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 14%
Chemical Engineering 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Energy 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 8 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2015.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#7,542
of 9,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,760
of 264,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#82
of 200 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 200 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.