You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
<b>zotepine, chlorprothixeneによる尿酸降下作用の解析 </b>
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
GOUT AND NUCLEIC ACID METABOLISM, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.6032/gnam.39.76 |
| Authors |
Nobuyuki Onizawa, Tatou Iseki, Naoyuki Otani, Motoshi Ouchi, Hajime Hasegawa, Naohiko Anzai |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2018.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from GOUT AND NUCLEIC ACID METABOLISM
#32
of 35 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,629
of 359,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from GOUT AND NUCLEIC ACID METABOLISM
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one scored the same or higher as 3 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.