↓ Skip to main content

Systemic Ventricular Dysfunction Between Stage One and Stage Two Palliation

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Cardiology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Systemic Ventricular Dysfunction Between Stage One and Stage Two Palliation
Published in
Pediatric Cardiology, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00246-018-1923-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas J. Kulik, Lynn A. Sleeper, Christina VanderPluym, Stephen P. Sanders

Abstract

Infants with a single ventricle can develop systemic ventricular dysfunction (SVD) after stage 1 operation, but available information is sparse. We reviewed our patients having Norwood, Sano, or hybrid procedures to better understand this problem. We conducted a retrospective, case-controlled cohort study of 267 patients having stage1 operation, examining outcomes between stages 1 and 2 (survival and subsequent cardiac surgeries), predictor variables, and histology of hearts explanted at transplantation. SVD developed in 32 (12%) patients and resolved in 13 (41%); mean age of onset was 3.0 ± 1.63 months; median = 2.79. SVD was not associated with cardiac anatomy, type of stage 1 procedure, weight, coronary abnormality, or atrioventricular valve regurgitation. The mean age of resolution = 12.1 ± 9.6 months; median = 6.3, and resolution may have been more likely with a systemic LV than RV (p = 0.067). Outcomes for the entire SVD group were less favorable than for those without, but patients with resolution of SVD had outcomes at least as good those without SVD. Myocardial histology (n = 4) suggested chronic ischemia. The risk of SVD after stage 1, while low, may be a fundamental feature of this patient population. SVD occurs with either a systemic RV or LV, although patients with a systemic LV may be more likely to have resolution than those with an RV. We identified no predictor variables, but histologic findings suggest chronic ischemia may be involved. Given the low incidence of SVD, multi-center studies will be required to better define predictors of onset and resolution.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 3 18%
Researcher 2 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Other 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 5 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 41%
Materials Science 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Unknown 8 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2018.
All research outputs
#18,639,173
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Cardiology
#867
of 1,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,741
of 328,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Cardiology
#15
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,418 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.